Getting six-pack abs is one of the most common goals for fitness enthusiasts. The two most frequently debated exercises to achieve this are crunches and planks. Both exercises target the core muscles, but they work in very different ways.
So, which one is better for building six-pack abs? To answer this, we’ll dive into the mechanics of each exercise, their benefits, their limitations, and what science says about their effectiveness.
Understanding the Core Muscles
Before comparing crunches and planks, it’s essential to understand the muscles that make up the core. The core consists of several muscle groups:
- Rectus Abdominis: This is the muscle responsible for the coveted “six-pack” look. It runs vertically along the front of your abdomen.
- Obliques: These muscles are located on the sides of your abdomen and help in twisting and bending movements.
- Transverse Abdominis: The deepest layer of abdominal muscles, acting like a corset to stabilise the spine.
- Erector Spinae: The muscles that run along your spine and help with back extension.
Building a strong and defined core isn’t just about appearance; it’s vital for overall functional strength, balance, and injury prevention.
What Are Crunches?
Crunches are a classic abdominal exercise that focuses primarily on the rectus abdominis. During a crunch, the upper body curls towards the pelvis, isolating the rectus abdominis muscle. Crunches are often considered a go-to exercise for anyone looking to define their abs, but are they truly effective?
Mechanics of a Crunch
A crunch involves lying on your back, with your knees bent and feet flat on the floor. The movement starts by contracting the abdominal muscles to lift your shoulders a few inches off the ground while keeping the lower back pressed into the floor. The contraction of the rectus abdominis is maximised in this position. As you lower your torso back down, you maintain tension in the core.
Benefits of Crunches
- Isolates the Rectus Abdominis: Crunches specifically target the rectus abdominis, which is the muscle responsible for creating the six-pack appearance.
- Variation Potential: There are many variations of crunches (e.g., reverse crunches, bicycle crunches) that target different areas of the core.
- Core Activation: According to a study published in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, crunches activate the rectus abdominis more effectively than planks.
Limitations of Crunches
- Limited Muscle Engagement: Crunches primarily focus on the rectus abdominis and fail to engage other important core muscles, such as the obliques and transverse abdominis.
- Strain on the Neck and Spine: When done incorrectly, crunches can cause strain on the neck and lower back. According to a study by the American Council on Exercise (ACE), many individuals perform crunches with poor form, increasing the risk of injury .
- Limited Functional Strength: While crunches can improve the appearance of the abs, they do little to enhance overall core stability and functional strength. A strong core is essential for supporting everyday movements and athletic performance, and crunches alone may not provide the necessary training for this.
What Is a Plank?
Planks, on the other hand, are an isometric core exercise that focuses on overall core stability rather than isolating specific muscles. The plank works the entire core, including the rectus abdominis, transverse abdominis, obliques, and even the lower back.
Mechanics of a Plank
A plank involves holding a position similar to the top of a push-up. The body forms a straight line from head to heels, with the forearms or hands on the ground and the toes pressing into the floor. The key to an effective plank is maintaining a neutral spine and engaging the entire core, including the glutes and shoulders.
Benefits of Planks
- Full-Core Engagement: Unlike crunches, planks activate not only the rectus abdominis but also the obliques, transverse abdominis, and lower back. A study published in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research found that planks engage more core muscles than crunches .
- Functional Strength: Planks build strength that translates into real-world activities. Since planks require the entire core to stabilise the body, they improve posture, balance, and overall functional movement patterns.
- Low Impact: Planks put less strain on the spine and neck compared to crunches, reducing the risk of injury when performed with correct form.
- Improved Endurance: Planks also help improve muscular endurance. This means the core muscles can maintain strength over longer periods, which is crucial for sports and everyday activities.
Limitations of Planks
- Less Focused on Rectus Abdominis: While planks engage the entire core, they do not isolate the rectus abdominis as much as crunches do. If the goal is to specifically target the six-pack muscles, planks may not be as effective in that regard.
- Difficulty in Progression: For beginners, planks can be quite challenging to hold for extended periods. There are fewer variations compared to crunches, which can make it harder to progress over time.
Crunches vs Plank: Muscle Activation
A crucial point in the crunches vs plank debate is how effectively each exercise activates the core muscles. Research by the American Council on Exercise found that while crunches activate the rectus abdominis more, planks activate the transverse abdominis and obliques to a greater extent.

The rectus abdominis is responsible for the visual definition of a six-pack, but the transverse abdominis plays a key role in core stability and spinal support. A 2018 study published in the Journal of Sports Sciences found that strengthening the transverse abdominis can lead to better core stability and a reduced risk of lower back pain . This suggests that while crunches might help define your abs, planks provide a more holistic approach to core strength and stability, which is essential for long-term fitness and injury prevention.
Caloric Burn and Fat Loss
One common misconception is that doing endless crunches will reveal six-pack abs. However, the visibility of the rectus abdominis depends largely on body fat percentage. No matter how strong your core muscles are, if there’s a layer of fat covering them, your six-pack won’t be visible.
In terms of caloric burn, planks are superior to crunches. A study published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise found that isometric exercises like planks burn more calories than isolation exercises like crunches . This is because planks engage more muscle groups, leading to a higher energy expenditure. In the context of fat loss, this makes planks more effective as part of a workout routine.
However, neither exercise will significantly burn enough calories on its own to result in fat loss. For visible abs, you’ll need to combine core exercises with a calorie-controlled diet and regular cardiovascular exercise.
Injury Risk and Safety
When it comes to injury prevention, planks have a clear advantage. Crunches, when performed with poor form, can strain the neck and lower back. A study by Spine found that repetitive spinal flexion, as occurs in crunches, can increase the risk of lower back injuries over time . In contrast, planks encourage proper spinal alignment and strengthen the muscles that support the spine.
For individuals with existing back issues, planks are generally a safer option. They strengthen the stabilising muscles without placing excess strain on the spine. Crunches, on the other hand, should be approached with caution if you have a history of back problems.
Combining Crunches and Planks for Optimal Results
While planks provide more comprehensive core engagement, crunches shouldn’t be completely disregarded. Both exercises have their place in a well-rounded core training programme. For optimal results, combining the two exercises can be highly effective.

A programme that incorporates both crunches and planks will not only help define the abs but also improve core strength, stability, and endurance. For example, you could perform planks to build overall core strength and stability, then follow up with crunch variations to isolate and define the rectus abdominis.
How to Incorporate Crunches and Planks into Your Routine
- For Beginners: Start with 20-30 seconds of planks, focusing on form and core engagement. Pair this with 15-20 crunches in sets of three. As your strength improves, gradually increase the duration of your planks and the number of crunches.
- For Intermediate and Advanced Levels: Aim for 60-90 seconds of planks in various forms (e.g., side planks, plank-to-push-up) and add in more advanced crunch variations like bicycle crunches or reverse crunches. Perform 3-4 sets of each exercise.
Conclusion: Which Is Better?
There is no definitive answer as to whether crunches or planks are better for getting six-pack abs. Each exercise has unique benefits and limitations, and the best approach is to include both in your routine. Crunches are great for isolating the rectus abdominis and helping define the six-pack, while planks offer full-core activation, improved functional strength, and better endurance.
For those solely focused on aesthetics, crunches may be more effective in defining the rectus abdominis. However, if your goal is not only to get a six-pack but also to build a strong, functional core, planks are the superior exercise.
Ultimately, building six-pack abs requires a combination of core exercises, cardiovascular activity, and a well-balanced diet to reduce body fat. Neither crunches nor planks alone will give you the abs you desire if your body fat percentage is too high.
Bibliography
American Council on Exercise, 2014. Core stability exercises: what’s the best?. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(1), pp.232-240.
Escamilla, R.F., McTaggart, M.S., Fricklas, E.J., DeWitt, R., Kelleher, P., Taylor, M.K., Hreljac, A. and Andrews, J.R., 2006. An electromyographic analysis of traditional and nontraditional abdominal exercises: implications for rehabilitation and training. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 36(5), pp.274-284.
Youdas, J.W., Hollman, J.H., Potter, C.L. and Creighton, R.A., 2008. The effects of training on trunk muscle performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22(3), pp.667-674.
McGill, S.M., 1995. Abdominal exercises: challenges and alternatives. Spine, 20(2), pp.172-174.
Key Takeaways Table
Key Takeaways | Crunches | Planks |
---|---|---|
Target Muscle | Primarily Rectus Abdominis | Entire Core (Rectus Abdominis, Obliques, Transverse Abdominis, Lower Back) |
Core Activation | High in Rectus Abdominis, low in other areas | High across all core muscles |
Functional Strength | Low | High |
Injury Risk | Moderate to High (Neck and Lower Back) | Low |
Caloric Burn | Low | Higher than Crunches |
Overall Effectiveness for Six-Pack Abs | Good, but limited to rectus abdominis | Excellent for overall core strength and fat burning |
Was this article helpful?
Source link: https://www.boxrox.com/crunches-vs-plank-which-is-better-for-getting-six-pack-abs-p82706319/ by Robbie Wild Hudson at www.boxrox.com